The OC continues outreach on Bird Banding Lab

The Ornithological Council continued its outreach this week regarding our support for the Bird Banding Laboratory. Housed at the Eastern Ecological Science Center, the BBL plays a crucial role in bird conservation and management in the U.S. and throughout North America. Long-standing USGS Species Management Research Program initiatives such as the Bird Banding Laboratory (and the Breeding Bird Survey) provide the primary long-term data on the abundance and distribution of avian species in North America. The Ornithological Council has become increasingly concerned about the BBL’s ability to deliver its vital services, given the financial challenges it currently faces. The OC previously contacted USGS leadership regarding these concerns.

This week, the OC reached out to the new Secretary of the Interior and to Members of Congress in Maryland and West Virginia, sharing our support for the BBL.

OC supports the Bird Banding Laboratory

The Ornithological Council reached out to the U.S. Geological Survey leadership today to support the important work of the Bird Banding Laboratory.

The OC wrote to express its support for the BBL, housed at the Eastern Ecological Science Center, which plays a crucial role in bird conservation and management in the U.S. and throughout North America. Long-standing USGS Species Management Research Program initiatives such as the Bird Banding Laboratory (and the Breeding Bird Survey) provide the primary long-term data on the abundance and distribution of avian species in North America. The Ornithological Council has become increasingly concerned about the BBL’s ability to deliver its vital services, given the financial challenges it currently faces.

The letter explained that the OC is concerned that the BBL’s funding in recent years has not been sufficient for it to continue to achieve its mission. Flat or decreasing budgets over several years have not kept pace with rising program costs or unsupported salary increases. Potential effects may include reduced band availability, delayed services and data delivery, and slower response time by BBL staff. The BBL works closely with government partners, so its current financial challenges also have the potential to affect the delivery of other federal migratory bird science, such as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Migratory Bird Program and the USGS Breeding Bird Survey. While the BBL has continued to deliver on its partners needs during the past several years of declining budgets, the flexibility that the Eastern Ecological Science Center has used to maintain its operations has reached its limit. For the BBL to continue to provide the myriad benefits that it currently provides to researchers, hunters, and the public at large, sustainable future funding is needed.

Read the OC’s letter here.

January-February NewsBRIEF from the OC

The Ornithological Council is pleased to provide this bimonthly report covering activities in January and February 2025. Over the last two months, Ornithological Council staff:

  1. Met with the Chief of the USGS Bird Banding Lab, in a quarterly meeting to discuss issues of mutual interest.
  1. Corresponded several times with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service lead on purposeful take policy and liaison to the regional migratory bird permit offices, regarding the recent changes to Migratory Bird Treaty Act permits.
  1. Announced the development of the 5th edition of the Guidelines to the Use of Wild Birds in Research. We’re still accepting volunteers for chapter authors and peers reviewers (contact Laura Bies at laurabiesoc@gmail.com). Graduate students and early career professionals are encouraged to volunteer. If you know of a recent methods paper relevant to a topic covered in the Guidelines, please submit the citation to Laura Bies (laurabiesoc@gmail.com). Also submit papers that are not method papers per se but assess the impact of the study methods.
  1. Continued work on a template field study policy for IACUCs to adopt. In response to many inquiries about compliance with the Annual Welfare Act, especially regarding field work, in light of the new regulations regarding birds, the OC is developing a sample policy regarding field studies under the AWA that institutions can use to develop and enact their own policies. 
  1. Provided direct individual assistance to ornithologists who belong to OC societies regarding the permits necessary to complete their research. During January and February, we assisted four individuals with permit issues. 
  1. Posted the articles and updates on the Ornithology Exchange:

All these updates, and more, are always available on the ‘News From the OC’ forum on Ornithological Exchange. Each time OC posts in the News from the OC forum, the link is sent to the OC society representatives to share with their networks.  If your society would like these emails sent directly to someone else in your society, please let me know.

Our work focuses on permits for ornithological research, animal welfare issues, and other policies that affect ornithologists and ornithological societies – and we greatly appreciate your support! Let me know if you have questions or concerns about this report or about any other matter of concern to your society or your society’s members.

November/December NewsBRIEF from the OC

The Ornithological Council is pleased to provide this bimonthly report covering activities in November and December 2024. Over the last two months, Ornithological Council staff:

  1. Met with the Chief of the USGS Bird Banding Lab, in a quarterly meeting to discuss issues of mutual interest.
  1. Submitted comments to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, in response to their announcement that they intend to prepare an environmental impact statement for a proposed project to eradicate nonnative rats from four uninhabited islands located in the Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge. In 2010, the OC performed an external review of a 2008 project to eradicate Norway rats from Hawadax Island (formally called Rat Island), in which non-target mortality was higher than expected. The comments submitted in November to USFWS were based on the recommendations made in that report.
  1. Submitted comments to the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service on its proposal to increase the fees for import permits and other various veterinary services. 
  1. Continued work on a template field study policy for IACUCs to adopt. In response to many inquiries about compliance with the Animal Welfare Act, especially regarding field work, in light of the new regulations regarding birds, the OC is developing a sample policy regarding field studies under the AWA that institutions can use to develop and enact their own policies. 
  1. Continued work on the 4th edition of the Guidelines to the Use of Wild Birds in Research in Spanish.  Last year, we published the 4th edition of the Guidelines in English, which consisted of text from the 3rd edition along with new reference lists for each chapter. In addition, old links throughout the document were updated. We are now making those updates to the Spanish version of the 3rd edition and will release the new version in the coming months. 
  2. Provided direct individual assistance to ornithologists who belong to OC societies regarding the permits necessary to complete their research. During November and December, we assisted four individuals with permit issues.
  3. Posted the following articles and updates on the Ornithology Exchange:

All these updates, and more, are always available on the ‘News From the OC’ forum on Ornithological Exchange.

OC submits comments on APHIS permit fees

Recently, USDA Veterinary Services’s Animal and Plant Inspection Service (APHIS) announced that it will increase certain fees, including the fees to receive, amend or renew import permits. APHIS is required by law to charge fees for these services. The agency does not receive any Congressional appropriations to cover the cost of certain veterinary diagnostics or to provide import/export related services for animals, animal products and byproducts, birds, germplasm, organisms, and vectors, so the agency’s ability provide these services depends on user fees.

Last year, APHIS finalized a rule changing how the agency updates and display fees. Individual fees are no longer included in the official regulations, but are instead updated on an annual basis (through a Federal Register notice) and posted online.

Generally, the fees included in the announcement are an increase from the current fees. According to the agency, these increases are based on several factors including: time, inflation, increase in subject matter expert workload, a shift in the level of work complexity, and trade and the general economy. The current fees were established in 2011 and 2012, using the best available 2009 data.

In response to the announcement, the Ornithological Council submitted comments to APHIS. While we generally support the fee structure, the comments repeat our request to extended the duration of APHIS import and transport permits, which are currently valid for only one year. Other agencies, like USFWS, issue import permits for 3-year durations. Read the comments submitted by the OC here.